Skip to content

Conversation

legendecas
Copy link
Member

Allow comparing a BaseObjectPtr or implicitly construct a
BaseObjectPtr with nullptr.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/http2
  • @nodejs/net

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Jan 13, 2025
@legendecas legendecas added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 13, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 13, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

@legendecas legendecas force-pushed the base-object-ptr-nullptr branch from 7d35dba to 06cb322 Compare January 22, 2025 11:07
@legendecas legendecas added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 22, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.
@legendecas legendecas force-pushed the base-object-ptr-nullptr branch from 06cb322 to 0d69bb8 Compare January 23, 2025 09:47
@legendecas
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased to fix the failures that were on the main branch

@legendecas legendecas added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 23, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@legendecas legendecas added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@legendecas legendecas added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Apr 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Apr 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit f692878 into nodejs:main Apr 10, 2025
66 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in f692878

@legendecas legendecas deleted the base-object-ptr-nullptr branch April 10, 2025 16:43
JonasBa pushed a commit to JonasBa/node that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: nodejs#56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
Allow comparing a `BaseObjectPtr` or implicitly construct a
`BaseObjectPtr` with `nullptr`.

PR-URL: #56585
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants